ArticleF1000Research2026
Empowerment Model for The Elderly and Community to Improve the Welfare of the Elderly.
Article in F1000Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop and examine an empowerment model involving older people and the community to support improvements in elderly welfare. Using a mixed-methods design, the study combines quantitative assessment of welfare outcomes with qualitative exploration of empowerment processes. Quantitative data were collected from 210 elderly participants involved in community-based empowerment programs. Welfare was measured across physical, psychological, social, and economic dimensions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, paired-samples t-tests, and multiple regression. The results show an increase in welfare scores between pre- and post-program measurements. The mean score increased from 3.12 to 3.89 (t = 9.46, p < 0.001). These findings suggest a positive association between program participation and reported welfare improvements, although causal conclusions cannot be established due to the study design. Qualitative findings provide insights into how empowerment processes may contribute to perceived improvements in well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.