ArticleInternational archives of otorhinolaryngology2026
Is the Presence of eCAP Intraoperatively a Predictor of Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults?
Article in International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The electrically-evoked compound action potential (eCAP) is commonly used to assess the physiological integrity of the auditory nerve's first neuron in cochlear implant (CI) users. Electrical stimulation of this neuron is essential for transmitting auditory signals to the auditory cortex, enabling the recognition of acoustic cues. Objective: To determine whether the presence of intraoperative eCAP influences CI outcomes in adult individuals with pre- or postlingual deafness. Methods: The present retrospective cross-sectional study included adults with hearing loss of various etiologies who received a CI, either with pre- or postlingual deafness. Data on intraoperative eCAP results and speech recognition test outcomes after 12 months of consistent CI use were extracted from medical records. Results: Data from 121 ears were analyzed, comprising 101 individuals with post- and 20 with prelingual deafness. In the overall sample, 90.9% exhibited eCAP presence intraoperatively. In the prelingual group, eCAP was present in 100% of cases, while 89% of the postlingual group showed eCAP presence. Individuals with intraoperative eCAP demonstrated significantly better speech recognition performance compared with those without eCAP, in both open- and closed-set tests. Conclusion: In adults with postlingual deafness, 89% exhibited intraoperative eCAP, which correlated with significantly better speech recognition outcomes. In contrast, the prelingual group demonstrated intraoperative neural responses, but no significant correlation with speech recognition performance was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.