ArticleHRB open research2022
Learning healthcare systems and rehabilitation: a scoping review protocol.
Article in HRB open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare literature has proposed that "learning organisations" (LO) or "learning healthcare systems" (LHS) that continuously generate and apply evidence, innovation, quality, and value can provide better care. This is of value to non-acute healthcare settings such as rehabilitation, which are complex, multi-dimensional and multi-disciplinary in nature. Little is known about how these frameworks have been applied to rehabilitation settings. Objective and inclusion criteria: The aim of this scoping review is to systematically summarise the literature conceptualising and operationalising LHS and LO in rehabilitation settings. Studies will be included which define a LO or LHS, describe an operating LHS/LO or include the translation of research evidence generated from LHS/LO data into healthcare improvement within a rehabilitation context. All study designs will be included. Methods: The guidelines from the Joanna Briggs institute methodology for scoping reviews will be used for this review. The literature search will be performed using a three-step search strategy: an initial limited search of two databases has been performed to identify relevant key words and index terms. The developed search string will be adapted and applied across the following databases: OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, APA PsycINFO and COCHRANE Database of Systematic Reviews. Reference lists of selected sources and relevant data-hubs will also be searched. A draft data extraction framework will be used and updated iteratively to extract data. Data will be extracted and described to address the research question of how LHS and LO have been conceptualised and operationalised in the context of rehabilitation. Discussion and Implications: There is potential for rehabilitation focused LHSs to advance global rehabilitation services and facilitate best practice. Little is known about how rehabilitation focused LHSs have been constructed and sustained. This will be the first review to explore LHS application in rehabilitation, guiding future development and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.