Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42732096›Full record

ArticleGates open research2026

Leave no one behind: Global Analysis on monitoring childhood vaccination timeliness and catch-up using data from the WHO/UNICEF joint reporting form on Immunization.

M Carolina Danovaro-Holliday, Ignacio Castro-Aguirre, Mitsuki Koh, Inae Carolyn Kim, Yoann Nedelec, Marcela Contreras, Naor Bar-Zeev, Martha Velandia-Gonzalez, Marta Gacic-Dobo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gates open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M Carolina Danovaro-HollidayWorld Health Organization, Geneva, GE, 1211, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7324-9198
Ignacio Castro-AguirrePan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Mitsuki KohWorld Health Organization, Geneva, GE, 1211, Switzerland.
Inae Carolyn KimWorld Health Organization, Geneva, GE, 1211, Switzerland.
Yoann NedelecWorld Health Organization, Geneva, GE, 1211, Switzerland.
Marcela ContrerasPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Naor Bar-ZeevWorld Health Organization, Geneva, GE, 1211, Switzerland.
Martha Velandia-GonzalezPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Marta Gacic-DoboWorld Health Organization, Geneva, GE, 1211, Switzerland.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-002735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the years following the Covid-19 pandemic, immunization programmes have increasingly focused on the capacity to conduct and monitor catch-up vaccination-for doses administered later than the recommended schedule. However, it is unclear whether information systems are able to monitor delayed vaccination. We analyzed WHO/UNICEF Joint Reporting Form data from 194 countries (2016-2022) to understand if systems for tracking delayed childhood vaccination are available and quantify catch-up doses of the first dose of a measles-containing vaccine (MCV1). For Latin American and Caribbean countries, we also explored data for the third dose of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine (DTP3). We assessed the completeness and consistency of reporting, the proportion of delayed doses, and vaccination coverage considering both timely and delayed administration. Analyses were disaggregated by WHO Region, World Bank income classification, and Gavi support eligibility. Results show substantial variability across regions and income groups in countries' ability to capture delayed doses. Between 2016 and 2022, the proportion of countries reporting a system to record delayed doses ranged from 55.5% to 64.4% annually, with the Region of the Americas (AMR) consistently reporting a higher proportion (77.1%-82.9%). Among countries with available data, the median proportion of delayed MCV1 doses was 4.4%, suggesting that including catch-up doses in cohort monitoring would increase reported coverage by approximately 4 percentage points. This increase was smaller in Gavi-eligible countries compared with non-eligible countries. The study summarizes global differences in information systems to monitor catch-up vaccination, presents examples of cohort coverage monitoring and illustrates the need to further improve immunization information systems and explore the potential for improving vaccination coverage and population immunity through catch-up activities.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsImmunization ScheduleVaccinationCOVID-19Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineGlobal HealthHumansMeasles VaccineUnited NationsVaccination CoverageWorld Health OrganizationDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineMeasles VaccineCatch-updelayed vaccinationglobalImmunizationimmunization information systemstimeliness

Identifiers

PMID42732096
PMCPMC13562087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.