Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42732073›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026

Construct differentiation and reliability of a novel curvilinear sprint test in female handball players.

Gizem Akarsu Taşman, Erkan Güven, Nasuh Evrim Acar, Deniz Şentürk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gizem Akarsu TaşmanFaculty of Sports Sciences, Mersin University, Mersin, Türkiye. gizemakarsu@mersin.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5027-2050
Erkan GüvenFaculty of Sports Sciences, Mersin University, Mersin, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9033-5968
Nasuh Evrim AcarFaculty of Sports Sciences, Mersin University, Mersin, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0423-1642
Deniz ŞentürkFaculty of Sports Sciences, Istanbul Gelişim University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1736-6482

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe curved 6-m goal-area line offers a practical basis for assessing curvilinear sprinting in handball, yet sprint testing in the sport remains predominantly linear. This study evaluated the reliability and construct differentiation of a curvilinear sprint (CS) test based on this existing court marking.

methodsTwenty-five female handball players completed one familiarisation and two test sessions separated by 48 h. In each session, players performed three linear sprint (LS) trials and three CS trials in each direction over the same 21.85-m distance. Performance differences and session effects were examined using repeated-measures analysis of variance, while reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients, coefficient of variation, typical error, minimal detectable change, and Bland-Altman analysis.

resultsLS was faster than the right and left CS conditions by 0.80 and 0.83 s, respectively (both p < 0.001), while LS and CS shared 58% to 68% of their variance. Between-session ICCs for the CS conditions ranged from 0.88 to 0.89, with CVs of 1.66% to 1.83%, while three-trial within-session ICCs ranged from 0.95 to 0.98. Performance was faster in the second session (p = 0.003), although the changes were smaller than the corresponding minimal detectable change values. CONCLUSıONS: Curvilinear sprint performance is strongly related to, but not fully represented by, linear sprint performance. The test showed good repeatability and provides a practical option for directly assessing curvilinear sprint ability in female handball players.

Indexed as

Construct differentiationCurvilinear sprintFemale playersHandball

Identifiers

PMID42732073
PMCPMC13570514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.