ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Development and internal validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting functional disability trajectories in hospitalized older patients with chronic low back pain.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFunctional disability poses a critical challenge to healthy aging in older patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, understanding of heterogeneous functional disability trajectories in this population remains limited, and effective risk stratification tools are lacking. This study aimed to develop and internally validate an explainable machine learning (ML)-based model for predicting heterogeneous functional disability trajectories and to construct an exploratory trajectory-based risk stratification pathway.
methodsIn this prospective cohort study, data on general characteristics, functional disability, pain level, physical activity, depression, and frailty were collected from older patients with CLBP. Growth mixture model was employed to identify heterogeneous functional disability trajectories. Ten explainable ML-based models were developed to predict these trajectories, and exploratory classification thresholds were determined using the Youden index.
resultsFour distinct functional disability trajectories were identified: persistent mild (PM), moderate and improving (MI), moderate and stable (MS), and persistent severe (PS). LightGBM achieved an AUC of 0.895 (95% CI: 0.855-0.941) in the validation set, with a calibration slope of 1.832 (95% CI: 1.625-2.021), intercept of 0.522 (95% CI: 0.317-0.795), and Brier score of 0.114 (95% CI: 0.098-0.137). Exploratory classification thresholds were 0.407, 0.308, and 0.320 for PM, MI, and MS, respectively, and 0.209 for the PS trajectory.
conclusionThis study developed an explainable ML-based prediction model for functional disability trajectories in older patients with CLBP and preliminarily explored a trajectory-based risk stratification pathway. The findings provide an interpretable, data-driven approach for estimating trajectory-specific risk within this dataset and may help inform future research on early risk identification. Further external validation, recalibration, and impact analyses are required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.