Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42732044›Full record

ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2026

Addressing Social and Cultural Needs with Lean Management in a National Sample of US Physician Practices.

Dorothy Y Hung, Lillian C Levy, Karen E Schifferdecker, Dasha E Zerboni, Stephen M Shortell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dorothy Y HungUniversity of California at Berkeley School of Public Health.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3099-917X
Lillian C LevyUniversity of California at San Diego School of Medicine.
Karen E SchifferdeckerDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice.
Dasha E ZerboniUniversity of California at Berkeley School of Public Health.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9307-4250
Stephen M ShortellUniversity of California at Berkeley School of Public Health.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7392-9801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy Points This national study of US physician practices finds that lean management, an approach to operational excellence and continuous quality improvement, can support integration of social and cultural services in primary care. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and commercial payers can expand programs including value-based, two-sided risk and global budget payment models that incentivize social screening and follow-up, language assistance, and workforce training to improve quality for vulnerable populations while reducing inequities in health care. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services may also consider requirements that physician practices implement operational or performance excellence systems, such as lean management for quality and process improvement, as a condition for participating in value-based programs. CONTEXT: Health-related social needs-including stable housing, food security, and interpersonal safety-and patient race, ethnicity, and language (REAL) are key contributors to health equality. Although primary care practices are well positioned to connect patients with resources and provide ongoing support, integrating interventions into clinical workflows remains challenging. This study examines how lean management, a quality improvement approach that emphasizes standardized work processes and respect for people, can support practices in addressing the needs of diverse populations.

methodsWe leveraged data gathered from a nationally representative sample of 1,245 US physician practices. Key independent variables included lean implementation and practice use of specific techniques such as value stream mapping, daily management systems with standard work, and rapid-cycle process improvement. We conducted multivariate regressions to assess relationships between the extent of lean implementation and availability of social and cultural support in primary care.

findingsPractices that implemented lean displayed 2.72 times the odds of having social screening, referral, and follow-up systems in place (95% CI, 1.20-6.19), and 2.85 times the odds of training providers on how to care for underserved populations (95% CI, 1.53-5.28). These practices also offered more language assistance (odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% CI, 1.22-3.82), routine collection of patient REAL data (OR, 3.75; 95% CI, 1.98-7.09), and more confidently addressed issues of race and/or discrimination among patients and staff (β: 0.12, P = .040). Value stream mapping, care team huddles, daily management, rapid-cycle improvement, and use of analytic tools were associated with higher odds of all sociocultural support measures, except for clinician representativeness of patients in terms race/ethnicity.

conclusionsLean management can support efforts to address patient needs by facilitating social risk intervention and culturally responsive care. Attending to social and cultural needs in US physician practices may improve patient experiences and health outcomes, while reducing avoidable health care costs for individuals and populations.

Indexed as

health equityhealth‐related social needslean managementprimary care practicesquality/process improvementrace, ethnicity, and languagesurvey data, multivariate regression analysis

Identifiers

PMID42732044
PMCPMC13570934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.