ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Lipase ITB 2.1: a structure- and function-validated model for anti-obesity drug screening.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lipases are key enzymes in lipid metabolism and represent important therapeutic targets for obesity and metabolic disorders. This study integrates sequence analysis, structural modelling, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and enzymatic assays to elucidate evolutionary conservation and the inhibitory mechanism of orlistat against lipase ITB 2.1. Multiple sequence alignment revealed strong conservation of catalytic serine residue at the nucleophilic elbow across bacterial, fungal, and mammalian lipases, with rare AXSXG motif substitutions in Bacillus and Geobacillus species, indicating adaptive structural variation. Phylogenetic and distance analyses demonstrated clear evolutionary clustering while revealing unexpected relationships among mammalian, fungal, and bacterial lipases, suggesting functional convergence. Superimposition of 3-dimensional structure confirmed preservation of the α/β-hydrolase fold and highlighted lid-dependent conformational changes that regulate active-site accessibility. Molecular docking showed substantially stronger binding of orlistat to the open-lid conformation than to the closed state, with lipase ITB 2.1 exhibiting the most favourable binding affinity among the analysed enzymes. Molecular dynamics simulations (100 ns) confirmed stable ligand-enzyme complexes, with monoacylglycerol lipase and pancreatic lipase displaying the highest structural stability, while lipase ITB 2.1 maintained consistent compactness and ligand retention. Enzymatic inhibition assays experimentally validated the computational predictions, demonstrating kinetic value with Vmax 1428 µM/min; Km 81 µM and complete inhibition at 56.25 µM orlistat. Collectively, these findings establish lipase ITB 2.1 as a robust model for lipase inhibition and drug screening studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42732036What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.