ReviewTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026
From family trials to genomic mate allocation: statistical and genomic strategies to accelerate sugarcane genetic improvement.
Review in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) underpins global sugar and bioenergy supply and is increasingly valued as a renewable biomass feedstock. Sustained improvement in commercial traits and resilience is constrained by long breeding cycles, clonal propagation, multi-stage testing, and a highly polyploid, heterozygous, and frequently aneuploid genome with substantial non-additive genetic variation. Genomic selection has demonstrated value for predicting elite-clone performance, yet its operational use remains limited at earlier decision points, including family selection, parent evaluation, and cross design. This review examines the biological, statistical, and genomic factors that shape these decisions, with emphasis on the Australian breeding context based on progeny assessment trials (PATs), clonal assessment trials (CATs), and final assessment trials (FATs). We evaluate challenges arising from family plot means, the use of different full-sib samples as nominal family replicates, spatial heterogeneity, competition, genotype-by-environment interaction, and the partitioning of additive and non-additive effects. We also assess the integration of pedigree and genomic relationship, genotype representation, allele-dosage estimation, aneuploidy, genomic prediction models, and training-population design. We then consider genomic prediction of cross performance and constrained mate allocation as approaches for improving expected family performance, accounting for cross-specific non-additive effects and managing relatedness. We propose a decision-centred framework that links family and clonal data across breeding stages, tracks the propagation of information and uncertainty, and supports parent recycling and cross allocation. We conclude with a practical research agenda for stage-integrated mixed-model and single-step analyses that connect early family evaluation with genomic prediction and cross-level decision support in sugarcane breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.