ArticleUrologic oncology2026
Advancing clinical trials for rare renal cell carcinoma subtypes: Consensus statements from the International Kidney Cancer Symposium North America 2025 think tank.
Article in Urologic oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
46 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRare renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes present unique challenges for clinical trial design and drug development. This consensus initiative aimed to provide actionable expert guidance on advancing preclinical and clinical development of rational therapeutic strategies for non-clear cell RCC variants, including papillary, chromophobe, MiT family/translocation, collecting duct, renal medullary carcinoma, and fumarate hydratase-deficient RCC.
methodsA modified Delphi method was employed to develop consensus statements among a multidisciplinary panel of 46 experts in urologic oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, molecular biology, genetics, and biostatistics, with representatives from pharmaceutical industry, regulatory affairs, and patient advocacy. Over multiple rounds, including an in-person meeting on November 13, 2025, 20 initial statements were proposed, evaluated, refined, and voted on. Consensus was defined a priori as a median Likert score ≥8 out of 10.
resultsTwenty final consensus statements were endorsed across 5 thematic domains: (1) Trial Design and Endpoints; (2) Perioperative Trials; (3) Operations and Accrual; (4) Biology-driven and Histology/molecular Strategy Trials; and (5) Preclinical Efforts, Target Identification, and Early Signal Testing. Key recommendations include prioritizing histology-specific trial designs over pooled "non-clear cell" approaches, adopting innovative single-arm and adaptive designs for ultra-rare subtypes, leveraging patient advocacy collaborations and natural history registries, and pursuing mechanism-informed therapeutic development.
conclusionsThese recommendations provide a framework to guide researchers, cooperative groups, regulatory bodies, and pharmaceutical industry partners in advancing evidence generation and therapeutic development for patients with rare kidney cancer variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.