ArticleBMJ mental health2026
Article in BMJ mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When psychiatry does not learn: Epistemic humility, ignorance culture, exclusion culture and diagnostic weaponisation.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Co-production is increasingly recognised as central to improving the quality, relevance and ethical integrity of mental health science, yet evidence is still needed on how lived experience involvement can be meaningfully embedded and sustained in complex research settings. Global Alliance for Living Evidence on Anxiety, Depression and Psychosis (GALENOS) is a Wellcome-funded collaboration conducting living systematic reviews and evidence triangulation, with people with lived experience contributing as Experiential Advisors and through a Global Lived Experience Advisory Board. This perspective uses GALENOS as a case example to reflect on what meaningful co-production practically requires especially in the context of large-scale, technical and international collaborations. It draws on a collective reflection designed and led by people with lived experience, developed through workshops and written contributions involving lived experience contributors, researchers and project-support staff. Discussions were organised around lived experience involvement, capacity development, diversity and representation and influence in strategic decision-making. Across these areas, contributors identified that experiential knowledge needs to become consequential, participation must be supported through care and flexibility, diversity must shape interpretation rather than representation alone and influence must be embedded in governance and decision-making. GALENOS shows that co-production is not a fixed method but an evolving relational practice requiring practical infrastructures for accessibility, accountability, continuity and ethical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.