ArticleOpen heart2026
Ultra-rapid outpatient treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis presenting with acute valve syndrome: evaluation of a novel pathway for urgent TAVI.
Article in Open heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUp to 30% of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have presented to hospital with acute decompensation of aortic stenosis (acute valve syndrome, (AVS)). Such patients conventionally undergo inpatient work-up and treatment by TAVI, associated with prolonged hospital stays, deconditioning and delayed recovery. This study aimed to evaluate the impact and feasibility of an ultra-rapid outpatient pathway for selected, stabilised AVS patients undergoing treatment by TAVI.
methodsThis single-centre cohort study with preimplementation and postimplementation comparison included consecutive AVS patients referred for TAVI over 6 months pre-pathway implementation and 12 months post-pathway implementation. Those meeting prespecified criteria were discharged home for completion of work-up and treatment by TAVI within 2 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was length of hospital stay. The primary safety endpoint was death or acute decompensation prior to TAVI.
results183 patients were included, of which 105 were evaluated for outpatient treatment after ultra-rapid pathway introduction. 58/105 (55.2%) met criteria for outpatient treatment, the remaining 47/105 (44.8%) were managed as inpatients. There was no significant difference in demographic or echocardiographic characteristics between management pathways. Patients treated as an outpatient had a shorter median total length of hospital stay (outpatient 12 days (IQR 7-17) vs inpatient 20 days (IQR 15-32), p<0.0001), saving an estimated 210 hospital bed-days. There was no significant difference in median time from referral to TAVI (outpatient 15 days (IQR 13-20) vs inpatient 14 days (IQR 10-18), p=0.22), nor in the incidence of the safety endpoint prior to TAVI between pathways (outpatient 6.9% vs inpatient 6.4%, HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.22 to 4.34, p=0.97), or after new pathway implementation (pre-pathway 6.7%, post-pathway 6.7%, HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.80, p=0.61).
conclusionsAn ultra-rapid outpatient pathway for selected AVS patients undergoing treatment by TAVI can successfully reduce total length of hospital stay. Further work is required to validate this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.