ArticleBMJ open2026
Intercultural interpreters' perspectives on the provision of sexual and reproductive healthcare to Eritrean and Somali forced immigrant women in Switzerland: a qualitative exploration.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to explore and synthesise interpreters' perspectives on the provision of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care to Eritrean and Somali migrant women in Switzerland, and to identify and analyse the professional and ethical challenges they encounter in this context.
designAn exploratory qualitative study from a social constructionist perspective. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, categorised and analysed through thematic analysis. SETTING AND
participantsThe study was conducted in the canton of Basel-Stadt, northwestern Switzerland. We have purposively selected 10 Eritrean and Somali intercultural interpreters serving as crucial intermediaries in assisting immigrant women to access SRH services.
resultsOur analysis of the interpreters' perspectives revealed three key thematic areas that they identified as central challenges for their Eritrean and Somali immigrant women: (1) perceived limited health literacy among patients, (2) sociocultural barriers that interpreters observed hindering patient provider communication and (3) structural difficulties that interpreters reported their patients faced in navigating the Swiss healthcare system. These challenges have now persisted for a long time, and research findings and recommendations do not appear to have changed practices. For example, while abortion services are fully covered by Swiss health insurance, contraceptive methods often require out-of-pocket payments. This financial disparity may discourage appropriate use of SRH services among immigrant women. The lack of culturally competent care and the limited availability of funding for intercultural interpreters were among important bottlenecks identified.
conclusionsThis study explored interpreters' perspectives on the provision of SRH care to Eritrean and Somali immigrant women in Switzerland. Despite the outstanding Swiss healthcare system, a majority of Eritrean and Somali refugee women struggle to benefit from SRH services due to limited health literacy, language barriers and challenges in navigating the Swiss healthcare system. Partnerships and integration of community entities, such as the Swisso-Kalmo association for Somali women and different Eritrean communities, could contribute via facilitating entry points for access to SRH healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.