ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026
Implicitly tuned: The neural effects of social feedback on adolescent learning.
Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescents are particularly tuned to social cues, but how does this sensitivity affect their learning? This study examined whether social feedback conveyed through human faces modulates implicit learning of auditory speech patterns. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to assess neural measures of learning in response to auditory linguistic input as participants engaged in a computer-controlled guessing task and received incidental social feedback in the form of smiling (positive) or frowning (negative) faces. The results showed that smiling faces produced neural response patterns consistent with learning statistical regularities in left-hemisphere regions involved in social and language processing, including the amygdala, anterior auditory cortex, inferior frontal cortex, and insula, whereas no significant learning-related effect was observed in the right hemisphere. In contrast, negative social feedback (frowning faces) did not produce a significant learning-related effect in either hemisphere, indicating no reliable neural effect of learning under negative feedback. Direct comparisons for positive and negative feedback revealed that the neural effect of learning was significantly larger for positive than for negative feedback, with this effect remaining robust after correction for multiple comparisons in the left insula. These results occurred despite the visual cues being incidental and unrelated to the auditory input. Together, the findings suggest that incidental social feedback from human faces influences neural mechanisms of learning during adolescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.