ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026
Neural encoding of infant-directed speech during infants' first year of life.
Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infant-directed speech (IDS) is the speech register that adults use spontaneously in interactions with young infants. Compared to adult-directed speech (ADS), IDS is characterised by exaggerated prosody and acoustically exaggerated speech sounds, which have been proposed to facilitate early speech processing and subsequent language acquisition in young infants. This study investigated the neural basis of this processing advantage. Specifically, it assessed cortical tracking of the spectral information in IDS and ADS in infants at 4 and 9 months of age. In line with previous research, results showed more efficient cortical tracking of IDS than ADS. While overall cortical tracking efficiency increased with age, there was no significant register by age interaction, indicating that the processing benefit of IDS is not influenced by maturational or experiential factors. These findings suggest that IDS facilitates neural encoding of not only low-frequency prosodic information in the speech signal as suggested by previous studies, but also of finer-grained acoustic detail conveyed across frequencies in the speech spectrogram. Thus, by using IDS, caregivers provide their infants with an optimal speech signal for the challenging task of acquiring the prosodic and phonetic properties of their native language during their first year of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.