ArticleBrazilian journal of physical therapy2026
An exploration of the factors predicting clinical responses to customized foot orthoses in individuals with plantar heel pain.
Article in Brazilian journal of physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCustomized foot orthoses (CFOs) are commonly used to manage plantar heel pain (PHP); however, individual responses vary. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of CFOs on pain and foot function and identify predictors of treatment response.
methodsA total of 120 individuals with PHP underwent baseline assessments, including demographics, pain, foot function, and physical examination. Participants wore CFOs for at least 6 hours daily over six months and were reassessed for pain and foot function. Treatment response was assessed using a 15-point Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale, with responders defined as those reporting GRC ≥ +4. Baseline variables were analyzed to identify predictors of treatment response.
resultsOf the 120 participants, 107 (89.2%) were classified as responders. Significant improvements in pain and function were observed at six months (p < 0.05), with large effect sizes. Logistic regression identified four significant predictors of a positive response: higher pain during barefoot walking (OR = 1.84, 95% CI, p = 0.018), lower low back disability (OR = 0.69, 95% CI, p = 0.007), greater calcaneal eversion on the asymptomatic side (OR = 4.17, 95% CI, p = 0.014), and absence of neural tension on the symptomatic side (OR = 0.05, 95% CI, p = 0.022). The model explained 51.1% of the variance and correctly classified 90.4% of cases.
conclusionMost participants who received CFOs demonstrated significant improvements in pain and function at six months. Both local and remote physical factors predicted response, highlighting the value of a comprehensive physical assessment in guiding orthotic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.