ReviewBrazilian journal of physical therapy2026
Relevance of improved reporting for non-pharmacological interventions in clinical trials: Bridging research to clinical practice.
Review in Brazilian journal of physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
what is knownAccurate description and fidelity of non-pharmacological interventions are critical to translating research findings into clinical practice. The lack of such detailed reporting undermines the essential and stable connection between research and clinical practice. WHAT SHOULD BE KNOWN: The aim of the current masterclass is to discuss how to improve the quality of reporting and reproducibility in non-pharmacological interventions. WHAT SHOULD CHANGE: Enhance the quality requirements for describing non-pharmacological interventions in the prospective registration of clinical trials. Mandate the use of the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) and Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) checklists, and of fidelity evaluation for all clinical trials involving non-pharmacological interventions. These requirements should extend from clinical trial registration through subsequent publications, including grant applications, protocols, abstracts, and preprints. Ensure that systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines apply not only general methodological criteria but also intervention-specific criteria and context for non-pharmacological interventions, respectively, to guarantee reproducibility and achieve expected outcomes. WHAT TO EXPECT: In the short term, improving the description and traceability of non-pharmacological interventions may encounter resistance to change. However, greater rigor should not be avoided, even if it results in a temporary reduction in the volume of available scientific evidence. Ultimately, prioritizing quality over quantity in healthcare research may lead to more meaningful and impactful advancements in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.