ArticlePoultry science2026
Effects of dietary protease and protease-probiotic combination on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal immune response in broiler chickens.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary supplementation with a microbial protease alone or in combination with probiotic components on growth performance, nutrient utilization, amino acid digestibility, and intestinal immune response in broiler chickens. A total of 240 one-day-old male Cobb 500 broilers were randomly assigned to 3 dietary treatments with 8 replicate pens of 10 birds each: a control diet, control supplemented with 0.1% Pearlzyme 1 (microbial protease), and control supplemented with 0.1% Pearlzyme 2 (microbial protease combined with probiotic components). Birds were reared for 21 d and fed a starter diet from d 0 to 12 and a grower diet from d 13 to 21. Growth performance was measured throughout the experiment, and energy utilization, nitrogen utilization, and apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids were determined during the grower phase. To evaluate intestinal immune response, 1 bird per pen was challenged with lipopolysaccharide on d 19, and intestinal morphology and ileal gene expression were assessed 4 h later. Both supplements increased apparent metabolizable energy (P = 0.003), nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy (P = 0.003), gross energy digestibility (P = 0.014), and dry matter digestibility (P = 0.002) compared with the control diet. Pearlzyme 2 increased feed intake (P = 0.018), body weight gain (P = 0.028), and nitrogen retention (P = 0.030) during the grower phase. Pearlzyme 1 improved apparent ileal digestibility of several amino acids, including threonine (P = 0.047), phenylalanine (P = 0.035), tyrosine (P = 0.034), and cysteine (P = 0.018). Intestinal morphology and tight junction gene expression were not affected by dietary treatment (P > 0.05). However, Pearlzyme 2 reduced ileal expression of interleukin-1 beta (P < 0.001) and interleukin-10 (P = 0.005) following lipopolysaccharide challenge. These findings suggest that microbial protease supplementation can improve nutrient utilization in broiler diets, and combining protease with probiotic components may provide additional benefits for growth and intestinal immune balance in antibiotic-reduced poultry production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.