ArticleExperimental physiology2026
Stretch versus shortening contractions subsequently decrease versus increase neural drive to the human tibialis anterior.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stretch versus shortening contractions subsequently decrease versus increase neural drive to the human tibialis anterior.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
EMG-based muscle force predictions are often inaccurate following active muscle stretch or shortening because of residual force enhancement (rFE) or depression (rFD), respectively, which can alter the neural drive to a muscle. However, the extent of neural drive modulation attributable to rFE or rFD remains unknown owing to the limited spatial sampling of intramuscular EMG. Therefore, we combined two blind-source separation approaches with high-density surface EMG and mixed-effects modelling to assess changes in neural drive from more representative motor unit samples. Seventeen participants performed dorsiflexion contractions at 20% and 40% of maximum voluntary torque in three conditions: stretch-hold, shortening-hold and fixed-end reference (REF) conditions. The ankle dorsiflexion torques and angles were matched using dynamometry to the REF condition during a steady state following a 1-s 25° stretch or shortening, during which we decomposed tibialis anterior high-density EMG recordings. Normalised EMG amplitudes were ∼2% lower following stretch and 1% and 3% higher following shortening relative to REF at 20% and 40% of maximum voluntary torque (P ≤ 0.008), respectively. Discharge rates from 19 matched motor units per person on average obtained via DEMUSE and MUedit were similar (P = 0.666). Following stretch and shortening, discharge rates were ∼1 Hz lower (P ≤ 0.029) and 0 (P = 0.459) to 1 Hz higher (P < 0.001) relative to REF, respectively. More unique motor units were also detected following shortening. These findings indicate that to account for rFE or rFD, neural drive is respectively decreased or increased via reduced or additional motor unit recruitment and discharge rate modulation, with a contraction intensity-specific rate modulation following active shortening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.