ArticleThe international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS2026
An Optical Tracking-Based Robot-Assisted System for Spinal Fixation Rod Bending.
Article in The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn spinal pedicle screw-rod fixation, rod contouring quality influences insertion ease, construct stability, and corrective effect. Conventional bending relies on surgeon experience and is limited by insufficient support, repeated adjustment, and inefficient workflow.
methodsThis study developed a tracking-based robot-assisted system for rod bending comprising an acquisition unit, software, and actuator. The system acquires screw-head coordinates, generates target rod shape, and discretises the curve into bending positions, axial rotations, and angles.
resultsIn five in vitro experiments, five assisted-versus-manual comparisons, and twenty paired cases, planned rods showed high consistency with target curves, with mean angle, rotation, and length errors within acceptable ranges. Assisted bending improved efficiency and reduced placement errors versus manual bending; clinically, the assisted side had a shorter operation time.
conclusionsThe system achieves a workflow from acquisition to rod formation, improving quantifiability, consistency, efficiency, and conformity, thus providing a pathway towards automated spinal rod shaping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.