SynthesisJournal of Crohn's & colitis2026
A therapeutic atlas of monogenic inflammatory bowel disease.
Synthesis in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsEvidence-based, mechanism-guided therapies are urgently needed for treating monogenic inflammatory bowel disease (mIBD). For such rare diseases, mechanistic insight is essential to guide treatment when conventional clinical trials are often not feasible. We aimed to summarize literature-based evidence and to identify knowledge gaps.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of published manuscripts evaluating the therapeutic efficacy in mIBD. We quantified and compared the global therapeutic response score across treatments and conditions. In a subset of conditions, biomarkers of longitudinal therapeutic response were evaluated in comparison to non-monogenic pediatric IBD cohorts.
resultsResponses to 35 therapeutics across the 102 known genetic causes of mIBD were evaluated in 241 articles and 669 patients, summarizing 302 gene-drug responses. The efficacy of at least one pharmacological intervention was identified in 61% (n = 62/102) of the mIBD conditions, highlighting a major unmet need for effective medications in many others. Gene- and pathway-specific responses were demonstrated for several therapies, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, gene therapy, and advanced therapies such as anti-TNF agents, IL-1 inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, as well as eculizumab in CD55 deficiency, abatacept in CTLA4 deficiency, and the immunometabolic agent empagliflozin in glycogen storage disease type 1b.
conclusionsThis study highlights the potential of precision medicine approaches tailored to genetic and pathway-specific mechanisms, while underscoring the urgent need for effective therapies in many monogenic conditions that remain without established treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.