Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42731007›Full record

ReviewMagyar onkologia2026

[Anthracycline use in breast cancer based on our current knowledge].

Gábor Rubovszky, Alíz Nikolényi, Katalin Boér

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Magyar onkologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gábor RubovszkyMellkasi és Hasüregi Daganatok és Klinikai Farmakológiai Osztály, Országos Onkológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary. rubovszky.gabor@oncol.hu.
Alíz NikolényiOnkoterápiás Klinika, Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Szeged, Hungary.
Katalin BoérOnkológia, Budapesti Szent Margit Kórház, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthracyclines have been a standard component of the curative treatment of breast cancer for decades. Due to the emergence of new anticancer drugs (taxanes, immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates) and potentially life-threatening and long-term side effects of anthracyclines, the range of indications for their use has narrowed in recent years and seems to be becoming clearer. The classification of breast cancers according to molecular subgroups and the ever-expanding clinical data allow the choice of applied treatments to be increasingly individualized, which has led to the decline of anthracyclines in most breast cancer subtypes. Our goal with our summary work is to facilitate everyday decisions regarding the use of anthracyclines by summarizing the available clinical evidence.

Indexed as

AnthracyclinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansTreatment OutcomeAnthracyclinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID42731007
PMCPMC13577713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.