ArticleMarine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)2026
Transcriptomic and Histological Responses to Fish Meal Substitution with Soy Protein Concentrate in Formulated Feed in Totoaba (Totoaba macdonaldi) Juveniles.
Article in Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the present study, we report the effects of soy protein concentrate (SPC) on growth parameters, liver morphology and hepatic transcriptomic response on totoaba (Totoaba macdonaldi) (153 ± 0.84 g). Two experimental isoenergetic diets (IDs), each containing 44% protein and 11% lipids, were formulated by replacing 30% (SPC30) and 60% (SPC60) of fish meal with SPC and compared to a commercial diet (CD) containing fishmeal. Treatments were performed in triplicate (n = 12 per replicate) over a period of 90 days. Fish fed the CD or SPC30 diets showed no significant differences in final weight (fW: 618.4 ± 20.13 and 624.4 ± 16.97 respectively). Conversely, fish fed the SPC60 diet exhibited the lowest growth performance (fW: 260.10 ± 57.65 g, weight gained: 68.84 ± 0.94 g and specific growth rate: 0.36 ± 0.22%). Liver from totoaba fed the CD showed a typical, uniform hepatic organization. In contrast, livers from SPC30 and SPC60 groups displayed lipid vacuole infiltration in hepatocytes and central displacement of the nuclei. Functional gene enrichment analysis of transcripts revealed that biological processes (BP), such as protein catabolism (ctra, ctrb, ela1, cbpb1, cbpa1), stress responses (bfar, dab, casp8, pawr), anatomical structure development (stml2, lrig2, hgf, ret), bile acid biosynthesis (s27a2, ntcp7, nr1h4) and lipid transport (s27a2, lipe4, fabpi), were the molecular mechanisms most affected by SPC supplementation. Collectively, these BPs suggest negative effects of SPC60 supplementation in totoaba.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42730962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.