ArticleCurrent environmental health reports2026
Examining Data-Driven Approaches for Clean Air Advocacy in a Changing Climate: a Scoping Review.
Article in Current environmental health reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAir pollution remains a global public health and climate challenge, causing millions of premature deaths annually and disproportionately affecting marginalised communities. This scoping review examines how data-driven approaches have been used to advocate for clean air in the context of climate change, what methods exist for data mobilisation, enabling conditions, limitations, and whether there were any equity or health considerations. RECENT
findingsRecent advances in low-cost monitoring, satellite data, and digital platforms have transformed the availability and granularity of air-quality data. However, how these diverse data sources are mobilised and used to influence policy, shape public discourse, and support community action remains poorly understood. Fifty studies from 41 countries and over 100 cities were included. Five categories of data-driven approaches were identified. These included sensor-based monitoring, modelling, digital platforms and data visualisation, community-centred approaches, and lived-experience assessments. Most studies (86%, n = 43) combined multiple data approaches. Data -driven approaches were used to generate and communicate evidence, support policy engagement, identify inequities, foster collaboration and mobilise communities. This review highlights the need to embed community co-production within monitoring efforts, align funding with long-term governance systems, and standardise open data platforms to ensure that clean-air initiatives are equitable, durable, and responsive to climate and health priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.