ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
Eco-anxiety, Psychology, and Theological Beliefs About Creation Among Clergy and Lay People in the Church of England.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Eco-anxiety, Psychology, and Theological Beliefs About Creation Among Clergy and Lay People in the Church of England.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interest in eco-anxiety is growing rapidly, partly for therapeutic reasons and partly because it may be a motivation for pro-environmental behaviours. There is little study of how religious identities or church traditions and specific theological beliefs are related to eco-anxiety. This cross-sectional survey of 3240 clergy and laity from the Church of England explored the relationships between eco-anxiety, psychological dispositions, church tradition, and specific theological beliefs about creation. Eco-anxiety was measured using a subset of items from the Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale. The number of eco-friendly activities increased with eco-anxiety, although the relationship was asymptotic rather than linear. The distribution of eco-anxiety symptom counts was zero inflated. Those recording zero symptoms were more likely to be younger, male, and Evangelical than those recording one or more symptoms. Recording zero symptoms seemed to be partly a mark of ideological 'eco-denial'. Psychological predictors of eco-anxiety were high emotional volatility scores (neuroticism), low thinking scores, and, to a lesser extent, low sensing scores. Theological beliefs about human dominion over creation and about divine rather than human control of the fate of the Earth predicted lower eco-anxiety, while theological beliefs about human stewardship and about the sacramental nature of creation predicted higher eco-anxiety. The effect of theological conservatism on predicting zero eco-anxiety was less important for Evangelicals, who were generally more conservative, than it was for other church traditions. Eco-anxiety in this religious sample was shaped by the complex effects of psychological dispositions, specific theological beliefs about creation, church tradition, and theological conservatism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42730938What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.