ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Perioperative visual loss after spine surgery: a systematic review of risk factors and report of a reversible case.
Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerioperative visual loss (POVL) is a rare but devastating complication of spinal surgery, most commonly associated with posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (PION) and central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). Its pathophysiology remains multifactorial and incompletely understood.
methodsA systematic review of the English-language literature was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting POVL after spinal surgery were included if they provided sufficient clinical, surgical, intraoperative, or outcome data. An illustrative reversible case was also reported according to CARE guidelines.
resultsThirty-nine studies were included, comprising 76 patients. PION was the most frequent subtype (34.7%), followed by CRAO (33.3%), unspecified ischemic optic neuropathy (18.1%), cortical blindness (8.3%), anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (4.2%), and central retinal vein occlusion (1.4%). Visual loss was bilateral in 22.2% of patients. Overall prognosis was poor, with no recovery in 66.2%, partial recovery in 22.1%, and complete recovery in 11.8%. Median estimated blood loss was 1200 mL, with a mean hemoglobin reduction of 4.02 ± 2.24 g/dL. Significant differences among POVL subtypes were found for operative time and duration of prone positioning (p < 0.01), with the highest values in PION. Estimated blood loss was also significantly associated with PION subtype (p < 0.01), and postoperative anemia was most frequent in cortical blindness and PION. Steroids were the most commonly reported treatment, although no association between treatment and recovery was identified.
conclusionsPOVL after spinal surgery is a multifactorial complication with predominantly poor outcomes. Hemodynamic impairment, anemia, prolonged prone positioning, blood loss, and fluid management appear central to its pathogenesis. The illustrative case suggests that reversible forms may occur, supporting a broader pathophysiological spectrum. Prevention remains the cornerstone of management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42730935What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.