ReviewPediatric radiology2026
Cumulative ionizing radiation exposure in pediatric patients with chronic diseases: a narrative review.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric patients with chronic diseases commonly experience frequent imaging, which is likely to result in significant cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation. A review of the literature on cumulative and effective radiation doses reported in non-oncologic pediatric chronic disease populations was conducted; 129 records were identified through searches in the SCOPUS, PubMed, and Web of Science databases, and data on disease type, imaging modalities used, and reported dose metrics were extracted. Across the 41 included studies, radiation exposure was influenced by diagnosis, age at first imaging, disease severity, and imaging modality. Plain radiography was the modality used most frequently; however, computed tomography (CT) and fluoroscopy accounted for the majority of cumulative effective dose, in some patient groups exceeding 20-50 mSv. The findings highlight the importance of evidence-based radiation protection referral guidelines, standardized imaging protocols, and dose reporting to support safer imaging practices in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42730925What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.