Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730915›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026

Living Well with Keratoconus: Implications for Person-Centred Eye Care.

Eilin Lundanes, Espen Andreas Brembo, Lena Leren, Vibeke Sundling

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eilin LundanesDepartment of Optometry, Radiography and Lighting Design, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, National Centre for Optics, Vision and Eye Care, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway. eilin.lundanes@usn.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3872-5531
Espen Andreas BremboDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Centre for Health and Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6738-0445
Lena LerenDepartment of Optometry, Radiography and Lighting Design, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, National Centre for Optics, Vision and Eye Care, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9083-5615
Vibeke SundlingDepartment of Optometry, Radiography and Lighting Design, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, National Centre for Optics, Vision and Eye Care, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9567-239X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvidence from patient-reported outcome measures demonstrate that keratoconus adversely impacts quality of life. However, qualitative research exploring the life experiences of persons living with keratoconus remains limited. Gaining insights to these experiences is valuable for eye health care professionals, as it enhances understanding about life beyond the clinic and supports person-centred care. The aim of this study is to explore how persons living with keratoconus experience vision-related quality of life.

methodsThis study employed a qualitative design, using semi-structured individual interviews with persons with keratoconus guided by a framework of vision-related quality of life. Participants were recruited through self-selection in response to an invitation posted on Keratokonus Norge (Facebook group) and through purposive sampling by optometrists in private practice. Data were analysed using inductive Systematic Text Condensation.

resultsThirteen participants with keratoconus, six women and seven men, representing all age decades from 20 to 70 years, were interviewed. All participants had been diagnosed with keratoconus for at least 5 years and represented a range of medical treatment histories and optical correction modalities. The inductive analysis through Systematic Text Condensation resulted in five main concepts: (1) A good life with keratoconus, (2) Contact lenses - a game changer, (3) Persistent symptoms and emotional impact, (4) Coping strategies and (5) Eye care is key.

conclusionAlthough keratoconus affects daily functioning and vision-related quality of life, participants' experiences show that living well with the condition is possible through appropriate eye care, personal acceptance and the use of various coping strategies. These insights provide valuable perspectives for person-centred care and offer reassurance and encouragement for individuals newly diagnosed.

Indexed as

KeratoconusLife experiencesPerson-centred careQualitative researchQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.