ArticleGeroScience2026
Impact of caloric restriction on biological aging: insights from a composite biomarker index in older adults.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Caloric restriction (CR) extends lifespan and delays age-related diseases in model organisms, yet its effects on biological aging in humans remain unclear. We pooled data from seven randomized CR trials (n = 829) and examined randomization to CR and change in weight with a biomarker index composed of CRP, IL-6, cystatin C, insulin, GDF-15, and TNF-R1. CR improved the composite biomarker index. The effect of CR decreased from -2.2 to -1.2 (95% CI -2.0 to -0.3) after adjustment for weight, while the effect of weight loss decreased from 0.22 to 0.16 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.23) when CR was included in the model, suggesting improvements in the biomarker index are only partially mediated by the amount of weight loss. Mediation analyses showed that only 48.5% (95% CI 22.6 to 82.2%) of the CR effects were explained by weight loss. These findings support the potential for composite biomarker indices as measures of intervention response and CR as a strategy to target biological aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42730911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.