ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
When thrombus meets intracranial dissection: a tricky decision for intravenous thrombolysis.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntravenous thrombolysis (IVT) has transformed the management of acute ischemic stroke, yet uncertainties remain, especially regarding its use in intracranial arterial dissection due to the risk of bleeding complications. While guidelines advise against IVT in intracranial dissection cases, previous studies have reported varying outcomes. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present the case of a 34-year-old male with sudden onset neurological symptoms. Initial imaging (NCCT) revealed a spontaneous hyperdense enlargement along the left V4 vertebral artery. CT Angiography (CTA) suggested a focal dissection with an associated thrombus. IVT was administered despite guideline recommendations, leading to a rapid clinical improvement and normalization of neurological function within 24 h. Subsequent MRI confirmed the diagnosis of left V4 artery dissection and monitored changes over time, showing the evolution of the mural hematoma. DISCUSSION: The case underscores the importance of considering unusual causes of stroke and the value of advanced imaging techniques for diagnosis. The initial NCCT raised suspicion for dissection, which was further validated by MRI. The treatment choice in this hyperacute phase was guided by clinical deterioration and imaging findings, despite the lack of extensive data supporting IVT in similar cases. The favorable outcome raises questions about the rigid application of current guidelines.
conclusionThis case highlights the need for individualized treatment approaches in patients with intracranial dissections presenting as ischemic stroke. The integration of various imaging modalities can aid in accurate diagnosis and management, suggesting that IVT may be beneficial in select cases despite existing guidelines. Further studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy and safety of IVT in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42730867What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.