Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730852›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026

Effects of velocity-based hypertrophy training on pectoralis major morphology, neuromuscular activation and bench press maximal strength.

Afonso Fitas, Miguel Gomes, Agustín Valdés-Álvarez, Sergio Miras-Moreno, Caetano Cardoso, Pedro Pezarat Correia, Goncalo V Mendonca

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Afonso FitasNeuromuscular Research Lab, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, Cruz Quebrada, Dafundo, 1499-002, Portugal. fitas.afonso@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4217-2815
Miguel GomesSport Physical Activity and Health Research Innovation and Technology Center (SPRINT), Santarém Polytechnic University, Av. Dr. Mário Soares, Rio Maior, 2040-413, Portugal.
Agustín Valdés-ÁlvarezLFE Research Group, Departamento de Salud y Rendimiento Humano, Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte (INEF), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/Martín Fierro 7, Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Sergio Miras-MorenoDepartment of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Caetano CardosoNeuromuscular Research Lab, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, Cruz Quebrada, Dafundo, 1499-002, Portugal.
Pedro Pezarat CorreiaEgas Moniz School of Health and Science, Caparica, Monte de Caparica, Almada, 2829-511, Portugal.
Goncalo V MendoncaNeuromuscular Research Lab, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, Cruz Quebrada, Dafundo, 1499-002, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore the effects of velocity-based hypertrophy training and percentage-based hypertrophy training on pectoralis major morphology, as well as maximal and explosive bench press strength in trained young males.

methodsNineteen participants were assigned to Percentage-based training (PBT) and Velocity-based training (VBT) for 10 weeks. Assessments were conducted at pre-, mid-, and post-training and included pectoralis major cross-sectional area (CSA), bench press maximal voluntary isometric contraction, surface electromyography (EMG), one-repetition maximum (1RM) and load-velocity relationship (LVR). LVR based load adjustments were performed at each session for the VBT group.

resultsMaximum voluntary isometric contraction and EMG remained unchanged over time in both groups. Distal, medial and proximal CSA and 1RM increased similarly between groups and time points (p < 0.05, ~ 15% increase from pre- to post-training). Although both groups performed a similar number of repetitions, the VBT group exhibited reduced eccentric time under tension (TUT).

conclusionThese findings indicate that VBT does not enhance muscle hypertrophy, maximal strength, or muscle activation. Overall, we highlight that, for the same number of repetitions performed, manipulating training intensity as a function of velocity during training did not yield hypertrophic advantage.

Indexed as

Maximal strengthMuscle growthResistance exerciseVelocity-based training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.