ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Effects of velocity-based hypertrophy training on pectoralis major morphology, neuromuscular activation and bench press maximal strength.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo explore the effects of velocity-based hypertrophy training and percentage-based hypertrophy training on pectoralis major morphology, as well as maximal and explosive bench press strength in trained young males.
methodsNineteen participants were assigned to Percentage-based training (PBT) and Velocity-based training (VBT) for 10 weeks. Assessments were conducted at pre-, mid-, and post-training and included pectoralis major cross-sectional area (CSA), bench press maximal voluntary isometric contraction, surface electromyography (EMG), one-repetition maximum (1RM) and load-velocity relationship (LVR). LVR based load adjustments were performed at each session for the VBT group.
resultsMaximum voluntary isometric contraction and EMG remained unchanged over time in both groups. Distal, medial and proximal CSA and 1RM increased similarly between groups and time points (p < 0.05, ~ 15% increase from pre- to post-training). Although both groups performed a similar number of repetitions, the VBT group exhibited reduced eccentric time under tension (TUT).
conclusionThese findings indicate that VBT does not enhance muscle hypertrophy, maximal strength, or muscle activation. Overall, we highlight that, for the same number of repetitions performed, manipulating training intensity as a function of velocity during training did not yield hypertrophic advantage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42730852What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.