Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730843›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Effects of Clenbuterol on Body Composition and Strength Following Resistance Training, Detraining, and Retraining in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lukas Moesgaard, Sebastian Skov Uhrenholt, Søren Jessen, Rasmus Blak Hasgaard, Vibeke Backer, Yvette Dehnes, Jens Bangsbo, Morten Hostrup

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05692856 (Muscle Memory After Treatment With Anabolic Substance Clenbuterol and Resistance Training in Humans), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05692856 naunknown statusnot on this map

Muscle Memory After Treatment With Anabolic Substance Clenbuterol and Resistance Training in Humans: Myonuclear Addition, Hypertrophy and Myocellular Reprogramming

TypeinterventionalSponsorMorten Hostrup, PhDRan2023 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsSkeletal Muscle PhysiologyArmsClenbuterol, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lukas MoesgaardClinical and Experimental Physiology Group, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6501-322X
Sebastian Skov UhrenholtClinical and Experimental Physiology Group, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Søren JessenClinical and Experimental Physiology Group, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7461-1264
Rasmus Blak HasgaardClinical and Experimental Physiology Group, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vibeke BackerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Yvette DehnesNorwegian Doping Control Laboratory, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jens BangsboClinical and Experimental Physiology Group, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1305-9274
Morten HostrupClinical and Experimental Physiology Group, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. hostrup@mortenhostrup.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6201-2483

Funding

World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) 22C12MH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClenbuterol, a potent β

objectiveThe aim of the study was to investigate the effects of clenbuterol on body composition and strength during a resistance training intervention, as well as the long-term effects of prior use of clenbuterol during detraining and subsequent retraining in healthy young men and women.

methodsThis randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark, between March 2023 and March 2025. Thirty-two healthy men (26 ± 3 years; mean ± SD; n = 16) and women (25 ± 5 years; n = 16) completed 8 weeks of resistance training with daily ingestion of clenbuterol (80 μg) (n = 16) or placebo (n = 16). This was followed by 16 weeks of detraining and another 8 weeks of resistance training. Before the intervention and after each training and detraining period, body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and strength was assessed by leg press and bench press 1-repetition maximum (1RM).

resultsClenbuterol increased gains in lean mass (+ 1.7 kg, p < 0.001) and 1RM bench press (+ 6 kg, p < 0.001) and leg press (+ 16 kg, p = 0.001) during 8 weeks of resistance training compared with placebo, with a more pronounced effect in males than females (lean mass: p = 0.003; 1RM bench press: p < 0.001), whereas the decrease in fat mass did not differ between clenbuterol and placebo (p = 0.614). Following cessation of clenbuterol, detraining decreased lean mass (p < 0.001), 1RM bench press (p < 0.001), and 1RM leg press (p = 0.026) to a greater extent in the clenbuterol group, such that initial changes in lean mass (p = 0.363) and 1RM bench press (p = 0.834) no longer differed from placebo, whereas 1RM leg press remained elevated in the clenbuterol group (p = 0.041). Retraining increased lean mass and 1RM leg press with no differences between the clenbuterol and placebo group (lean mass: p = 0.393; 1RM leg press: p = 0.662), whereas the increase in 1RM bench press was greater in the clenbuterol group (+ 3 kg, p = 0.047).

conclusionClenbuterol markedly augments training-induced gains in lean mass and strength. After discontinuation, prior clenbuterol exposure does not enhance retraining-induced lean mass gains, but some strength-related advantages persist.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05692856.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.