ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Current quality challenges in H&E preparation: The critical foundation for increased use of digital pathology and AI emergence.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) glass slide preparation is fundamental to histopathology. Pathologists' expertise routinely mitigates potential issues due to quality variability into or across laboratories, ensuring diagnostic accuracy. However, as artificial intelligence (AI) induced by whole slide imaging (WSI) emerges as a future advancement in pathology, a shift toward greater technical standardisation of the preparations or adaptive algorithms deserves consideration. This study examined longitudinal data (2019-2024) from the French national external quality assessment (EQA) programme integrated with a national survey conducted in 2024. We report that up to 25,5% of H&E slides, varying by tissue type and assessment year, exhibited technical preparation imperfection from multiple stages, including microtomic sectioning, excessive thickness, and tissue stretching. Separately, 8,3% to 23,8% of slides showed suboptimal staining, characterised mainly by insufficient nucleo-cytoplasmic contrast or intensity fluctuations. Advocating sustained quality improvement to prepare for future diagnostic pathology, we emphasise that optimising pre-analytical H&E preparation quality before AI deployment is critical: robust AI performance requires consistent, high-quality inputs rather than reliance on hypothetical post-hoc algorithmic compensation. Prioritising quality at the source reduces computational burden, environmental impact, and deployment costs while enhancing ethical transparency. Our findings provide technical areas for improvement to enhance H&E testing while anticipating AI integration at scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42730840What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.