ReviewMycopathologia2026
Pediatric Candidozyma auris Infection and Colonization in a Tertiary Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Experience.
Review in Mycopathologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Candidozyma auris is a multidrug-resistant yeast that can cause invasive infections and healthcare-associated outbreaks. This retrospective study evaluated seven pediatric patients in whom C. auris was detected in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit in Türkiye between February 2023 and February 2024. The mean age of the patients was 95.71 ± 80.52 months. Five patients had chronic illnesses and a history of multiple hospitalizations. C. auris was isolated from blood (five isolates), urine (three isolates), skin swab (three isolates), and catheter tip (one isolate) cultures. At initial evaluation, one patient was classified as colonized, whereas six were diagnosed with clinically significant C. auris infections, including bloodstream infection, catheter-related bloodstream infection, and urinary tract infection. Of the five patients, three were initially diagnosed with urinary tract infection; however, one of these patients was ultimately considered to have urinary colonization rather than infection. Six patients received antifungal therapy. Five were treated for candidemia, and two of these patients also had concurrent urinary tract infection. All isolates were susceptible to echinocandins. Two patients died due to C. auris-related candidemia. Herein, we present our experience in controlling a suspected healthcare-associated C. auris outbreak and the treatment approaches implemented following the first identified C. auris case in our hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42730818What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.