Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730783›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026

Robotic surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review.

Konstantinos Kossenas, Nikolaos Koliakos, Dimitrios Papakonstantinou, Georgios D Lianos, Nikolaos Memos, Pantelis Antonakis, Efstathios Kotidis, Grigorios Christodoulidis, Dimitrios Schizas

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Konstantinos KossenasSecond Propaedeutic Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece. kossenaswork@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5712-6523
Nikolaos KoliakosDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Dimitrios PapakonstantinouThird Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Georgios D LianosDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Nikolaos MemosFirst Propaedeutic Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippocrateion General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Pantelis AntonakisSecond Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aretaieion Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Efstathios KotidisFourth Department of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital, George Papanikolaou, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Grigorios ChristodoulidisDepartment of General Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Dimitrios SchizasFirst Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic surgery is used for selected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), particularly when location makes conventional wedge resection difficult. We synthesised technical, perioperative, pathological, functional and oncological outcomes. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 14 August 2026. Primary reports with at least three eligible robotic gastric-GIST patients were included. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and completed design-specific JBI appraisal. Because outcome definitions, denominators and reporting were heterogeneous, findings were synthesised narratively in accordance with SWiM guidance rather than pooled. Twenty-three studies, including six comparative cohorts, were included. Institutional robotic cohorts contained 3-45 eligible patients; one national registry included 1,567 robotic cases. Tumour size ranged from 2.68 ± 1.55 to 7.9 ± 1.8 cm among studies reporting means. Most institutional reports described R0 resection in all eligible patients; exceptions were 23/24 and 24/25, while the registry reported 1,425/1,567 R0 resections. Grade III morbidity occurred in 2/25 patients in one function-preserving series. Registry 30- and 90-day mortality after robotic resection were 0.5% and 0.8%, respectively. Comparative studies did not demonstrate superior postoperative or oncological outcomes with robotic surgery. Robotic gastric-GIST resection appears feasible in selected patients and may facilitate organ-preserving surgery at anatomically challenging sites. Current observational evidence does not establish comparative functional, oncological or economic superiority.

Indexed as

GastrectomyGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsRobotic Surgical ProceduresStomach NeoplasmsHumansTreatment OutcomeFeasibilityGastrectomyGastrointestinal stromal tumourMorbidityMortalityRobotic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.