ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Enteral Feeding Methods in Patients with Vocal Fold Motion Impairment Following Cardiothoracic Surgery.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vocal fold motion impairment in children with congenital heart disease occurs at the time of cardiothoracic, surgical aortic arch manipulation due to injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of pediatric patients (≤ 18 years old) diagnosed with vocal fold motion impairment post-cardiothoracic surgery between 2021 and 2023. Patients were categorized by the presence or absence of vocal fold motion impairment and then subdivided into pre- or post-pyloric enteral feed groups. Of the 61 patients eligible for inclusion, 32 were diagnosed with vocal fold motion impairment. Infants with vocal fold motion impairment had a longer length of stay (35 [18, 199.5] versus 22 [9, 39] days, p = 0.03), more complex surgeries/aortic arch augmentation (75% versus 41%, p = 0.02), and were fed more by nasoduodenal route (31% versus 7%, p = 0.02). Patients who were fed via the nasoduodenal route compared to those fed via the pre-pyloric route were more likely to have longer cardiopulmonary bypass times (188 [147, 251] versus 93 [76, 100] min, p = 0.01), single ventricle palliation (60% versus 18%, p = 0.037) and longer length of stay (138 [44, 255] versus 24.5 [16, 60] days, p = 0.02). There was no difference in aspiration events (p = 0.09), aspiration pneumonia (p = 1.0), or readmission rates (within 30 days, p = 0.22) between the groups. Pre-pyloric feeding methods in patients with vocal fold motion impairment had no more adverse events of aspiration post-operatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42730767What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.