ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2026
Comprehension of an artificial intelligence-generated discharge letter versus a traditional discharge letter: two controlled quasi-experimental parallel-group studies.
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDischarge letters are essential for continuity of care, yet patients often misunderstand their content. Poor discharge communication is associated with medication errors, inappropriate healthcare use, and hospital readmissions. Artificial intelligence (AI) language models may improve discharge documentation clarity and accessibility. This study aimed to compare a GPT-4-generated, accessibility-optimized discharge letter with a conventional discharge letter regarding comprehension of key discharge information and to evaluate satisfaction and identify predictors of comprehension.
methodsTwo controlled quasi-experimental parallel-group studies were conducted. Study 1 included adults recruited online (n = 341 analysed), while Study 2 involved medical and nursing students at the University of Turin (n = 791 analysed). Allocation was based on age parity. The primary outcome was a structured comprehension score assessing diagnosis, treatment, investigations, and follow-up instructions. Secondary outcomes included readability, clarity, perceived comprehension, organization, and satisfaction. Health literacy (HL) was assessed using the HLS-EU-Q6. Multiple linear regression analyses identified predictors of comprehension.
resultsParticipants receiving the AI-generated discharge letter achieved significantly higher comprehension scores in both studies (Study 1: median 4 vs. 2; Study 2: median 4 vs. 3; both P < .001). Differences remained significant after adjustment for sociodemographic variables, HL, and healthcare background. AI-generated letters also improved all secondary outcomes (all P < .001). No significant improvement was observed for identification of follow-up appointment dates. Higher comprehension was associated with healthcare background, higher education, sufficient HL, and better perceived health status.
conclusionAI-generated discharge letters significantly improved measured comprehension and satisfaction in both general and higher-literacy populations; validation using real clinical letters and diverse patients is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.