ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2026
Cognitive reserve and everyday functioning in cognitively unimpaired older adults: evidence from the CAN-PROTECT study.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCognitive reserve (CR) is thought to buffer against the clinical manifestation of dementia, preserving cognitive function despite accumulating pathology. However, less is known about how CR relates to the capacity to independently perform activities of daily living (ADL), particularly among cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults. Here, we investigated this association.
methodsBaseline data from 1571 CU participants (mean age: 64.7 ± 7.6; 81.3% female) from the CAN-PROTECT study were analyzed. A composite CR score was derived from education, occupational complexity, and engagement in cognitively stimulating activities. Functional ability was measured using the Standard Assessment of Global Everyday Activities (SAGEA) scale, capturing cognitive, applied cognitive, instrumental, and basic ADL, and mobility. Negative binomial models examined associations between CR and global and domain-specific ADL, adjusting for age, sex, cognition, behavior, and physical/sensory limitations. Additional models tested the independent contribution of CR components to functional outcomes. Mediation analyses assessed the effect of CR on quality of life (QoL) through ADL abilities.
resultsHigher CR was associated with lower global ADL impairment (count ratio = 0.58, 95% CI, 0.36-0.94, p = .027), driven by 49% less impairment in applied cognitive ADL (95% CI, 0.26-0.97, p = .038). Among CR domains, education showed the most consistent association with lower impairment across all ADL domains and was indirectly linked to better QoL through improved function.
conclusionsCR, particularly education, may play an important role in supporting functional abilities and QoL among CU older adults. Enhancing CR may be a promising avenue to promote functional independence and healthy aging, even in the absence of cognitive impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.