Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730566›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

The new WHO infertility guideline: A universal right to equitable, evidence-based fertility care.

M Louise Hull, Kurt T Barnhart, Nikhil C Purandare, Aparna Sridhar, E Göknur Topçu, Scott M Nelson, FIGO REI committee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M Louise HullRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1813-3971
Kurt T BarnhartPenn Fertility Care, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6142-5350
Nikhil C PurandareUniversity College Hospital Galway, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-6979
Aparna SridharDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0813-9130
E Göknur TopçuDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Health, Şişli Kolan International Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1362-6224
Scott M NelsonSchool of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9099-3047
FIGO REI committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The WHO 'Guideline for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infertility' heralds a significant global shift towards recognizing infertility as a medical condition requiring prevention, diagnosis, treatment and policy support. This recognition is vital for the one in six people with infertility worldwide and for policymakers trying to address the societal consequences of fertility decline. The guideline's 40 recommendations and six good practice statements emphasize pragmatic diagnostic pathways, cost-effective interventions, psychosocial support and shared decision-making. Preventive measures, including fertility education, lifestyle counseling, smoking cessation and early management of sexually transmitted infections, are recommended in routine care to improve future reproductive health outcomes. The guideline aligns closely with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) vision for equitable, context-specific fertility care. FIGO supports adaptation of fertility services according to local resources while promoting access to fertility services irrespective of marital status, gender, sexual orientation or socioeconomic circumstances. Both WHO and FIGO advocate the incorporation of infertility care within national reproductive health strategies to improve access and affordability, particularly in low- and middle-resource settings. Compared with regional fertility society guidelines, the WHO recommendations prioritize scalable and affordable approaches suitable for diverse health systems. Although important gaps remain, including fertility preservation, third-party reproduction, and expanded guidance on male-factor infertility and endometriosis, this guideline provides a practical framework for clinical uptake across nations. Its greatest contribution is the reframing of infertility from a neglected and stigmatized condition to a public health priority within universal health coverage.

Indexed as

InfertilityPractice Guidelines as TopicReproductive Health ServicesEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleReproductive HealthWorld Health Organizationinfertilityinfertility guidelinesreproductive healthWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID42730566
PMCPMC13674831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.