Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730533›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chiropractic education2026

Exploring exposure to spontaneous learning and redundancy in learning at a chiropractic student conference in South Africa.

Junaid Shaik, Desiree Varatharajullu, Yomika Venketsamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chiropractic education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore chiropractic students' perceptions of their learning experiences during the 2023 World Congress of Chiropractic Students African Regional Event. The focus was on identifying benefits related to spontaneous learning, assessing the impact of social and equivalence redundancy, and uncovering opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration and professional development. Methods: This was a thematic qualitative, exploratory descriptive design. Chiropractic students who attended the event participated in semistructured interviews; data saturation was achieved after 12 interviews. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Tesch's 8-step coding method. Trustworthiness was ensured through Guba's 4 criteria: credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Results: Seven major themes emerged namely. interdisciplinary collaboration and integration, networking and knowledge exchange with fellow professionals, skill enhancement techniques and diverse practice methods, internship portfolio requirements, career pathways awareness, practical clinical application in real-world settings, and areas for enhancement and progress. Students reported gaining valuable spontaneous knowledge, including exposure to techniques not covered in their formal curriculum. However, instances of social and equivalence redundancy limited the novelty of some learning experiences. Additional concerns included limited student participation, insufficient marketing, and financial barriers to attendance. Conclusion: The conference provided experiential learning through exposure to diverse professional perspectives and practices. Comments from interviewees suggest that future student conferences should be strategically structured to address content redundancy, enhance marketing and student access, and incorporate broader interdisciplinary participation. Such improvements may better support chiropractic students' academic and professional development.

Indexed as

ChiropracticConferencesLearningStudents

Identifiers

PMID42730533
PMCPMC13546072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.