Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730486›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental quality

Effects of screen size and aeration on volatile fatty acids and Escherichia coli during storage of dairy manure slurry.

Dai Hanajima, Kenichi Furuhashi, Nonoka Usui, Shiho Ishikawa, Eiryu Okamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dai HanajimaHokkaido Agricultural Research Center, NARO, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3160-6908
Kenichi FuruhashiGraduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Nonoka UsuiHokkaido Agricultural Research Center, NARO, Sapporo, Japan.
Shiho IshikawaDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Information Sciences, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu, Japan.
Eiryu OkamotoDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Information Sciences, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu, Japan.

Funding

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan D5C1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to intensive dairy farming, large amounts of animal waste accumulate in small areas, leading to various environmental problems. Solid separation technology and subsequent treatment of animal manure can facilitate manure handling, including composting of the solid fraction and land application of the liquid fraction. Removal of solids from manure slurry is expected to reduce the source of odorants; however, the specific compounds effectively mitigated remain unclear. In this study, we evaluated the effects of separation using screens with three different mesh sizes (10, 2, and 0.5 mm) on the production of volatile fatty acids (VFAs), representative odorants of dairy manure slurry, and on the persistence of Escherichia coli in raw and aerated liquid fractions stored for 45 days. We found that separation effectively reduced VFAs, particularly low-odor-threshold compounds (n-butyric and n-valeric acids). However, separation was not effective in reducing branched fatty acids (i-butyric and i-valeric acids), probably because these compounds originate from fine particles (<0.5 mm) containing protein. Separation significantly reduced E. coli counts during storage. The liquid fraction obtained using a 0.5 mm screen exhibited E. coli counts below detection limit in both raw and aerated treatments. This study provides evidence supporting the use of fine screen sizes to significantly reduce VFAs, which impact the olfactory sense and prevent spreading E. coli into the wider environment through slurry application.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliFatty Acids, VolatileManureWaste Disposal, FluidAnimalsCattleDairyingFatty Acids, VolatileManure

Identifiers

PMID42730486
PMCPMC13570248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.