Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730454›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026

Brain network reconfiguration during reward prediction error processing.

Kamil Bonna, Oliver J Hulme, Simon R Steinkamp, David Meder, Maria E C van der Weij, Włodzisław Duch, Karolina Finc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kamil BonnaCentre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland.
Oliver J HulmeDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Simon R SteinkampDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
David MederDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maria E C van der WeijDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Włodzisław DuchCentre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland.
Karolina FincInstitute of Advanced Studies, Centre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning from experience is theorized to be driven by reward prediction error (RPE) signals that reflect updates to our expectations of reward. Despite numerous studies on the neural correlates of RPEs, the question of how large-scale networks (LSN) in the brain reconfigure in response to an RPE learning signal remains open. Here, we examine how functional networks change in response to RPEs depending on the context. In our study, participants performed a probabilistic reversal learning task while we acquired fMRI data in two experimental settings: reward-seeking and punishment-avoiding. Participants' behavior was best explained by models with different learning rates for positive and negative RPEs. Furthermore, no evidence was found for context-dependent learning rates. Using behaviorally fitted RPE models, we performed a whole-brain network analysis. This analysis revealed classical reward structures, where striatal reward networks emerge as modules when the community structure is examined at a finer resolution, and a ventromedial prefrontal network emerges at a coarser resolution. Using the same behavioral model, we found that, compared with negative RPEs, positive RPEs increased within-network integration and decreased between-community integration. This indicates that there are distinctly different neural processes for positive and negative RPEs.

Indexed as

Decision makingfMRIModularityNetwork reconfigurationReinforcement learningReward prediction errorRPE

Identifiers

PMID42730454
PMCPMC13569333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.