ReviewCureus2026
Polyvascular Atherosclerotic Disease: A Narrative Review of the Role of Systematic Bedside Vascular Examination.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polyvascular atherosclerotic disease refers to clinically significant atherosclerosis involving two or more arterial territories and is associated with a greater risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events than disease confined to a single vascular bed. Because atherosclerosis is a systemic process, the identification of disease in one territory should prompt clinicians to consider involvement elsewhere. Despite increasing reliance on advanced imaging, a systematic bedside vascular examination remains an accessible and inexpensive first step for identifying findings that may justify targeted investigation. This narrative review examines the role of clinical history and physical examination in evaluating patients with established or suspected atherosclerotic disease across multiple vascular territories. Particular attention is given to carotid auscultation, bilateral upper-extremity blood pressure and pulse assessment, cardiac evaluation, abdominal vascular examination, and examination of the femoral, popliteal, posterior tibial, and dorsalis pedis arteries, together with inspection for limb ischemic changes. The review also discusses the diagnostic limitations of individual physical findings and emphasizes that bedside examination should not be considered a substitute for objective testing. Rather, abnormal or suspicious findings can guide the selective use of ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement, duplex ultrasonography, computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and appropriate cardiac investigations. A structured approach that begins with systematic clinical assessment and progresses to targeted testing may help identify clinically important multiterritory disease while avoiding indiscriminate imaging of asymptomatic vascular beds. Incorporating comprehensive vascular examination into routine assessment may therefore strengthen cardiovascular risk recognition and support more individualized investigation and management of patients with systemic atherosclerosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.