ArticleCardiology research2026
Diagnostic Value of Systemic Inflammatory Indices in Myocardial İnfarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: Comparison With Obstructive Myocardial Infarction and Non-Critical Coronary Artery Disease.
Article in Cardiology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) represents a heterogeneous clinical entity with diverse underlying mechanisms, and its diagnostic evaluation remains challenging in routine clinical practice despite advances in multimodality imaging. Systemic inflammatory indices derived from routine laboratory parameters have recently gained attention as potential markers reflecting inflammatory burden in cardiovascular diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the potential diagnostic utility of systemic inflammatory indices in patients with MINOCA and to compare these indices across patients with obstructive myocardial infarction and non-critical coronary artery disease. Methods: In this retrospective single-center observational study, a total of 2,050 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography between January 1, 2023, and January 1, 2024 were initially screened. After applying predefined exclusion criteria, including renal failure, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular events, arrhythmias, severe valvular heart disease, severe anemia, and incomplete clinical data, 496 patients were eligible for the final analysis. Patients were classified into three groups according to coronary angiographic findings and troponin levels: MINOCA (n = 67), obstructive myocardial infarction (n = 222), and non-critical coronary artery disease (n = 207). Demographic characteristics, laboratory parameters, echocardiographic findings, and systemic inflammatory indices including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis together with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine independent predictors associated with MINOCA. Results: Patients with obstructive myocardial infarction were older and had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension compared with the MINOCA and non-critical coronary artery disease groups (P < 0.001). Systemic inflammatory indices including neutrophil count, SII, NLR, PLR, MLR, C-reactive protein (CRP), and CAR were significantly higher in the obstructive myocardial infarction group, whereas intermediate levels were observed in the MINOCA group (P < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly lower in the obstructive myocardial infarction group compared with the MINOCA and non-critical coronary artery disease groups (P < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, LVEF was identified as an independent predictor of MINOCA when compared with obstructive myocardial infarction, whereas SII remained an independent predictor in comparisons between MINOCA and non-critical coronary artery disease groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses demonstrated that LVEF showed the highest diagnostic performance among the evaluated parameters. Conclusions: Systemic inflammatory indices differ significantly among patients with MINOCA, obstructive myocardial infarction, and non-critical coronary artery disease. Easily accessible inflammatory markers together with echocardiographic parameters such as LVEF may provide additional diagnostic value in the clinical evaluation of patients with suspected MINOCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.