Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730354›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2026

"Can You Hear Me? Can Anybody Pretty Please Validate [Me]?": The Long Shadow of Separation and Liminality in Military Physicians' Remediation.

Tasha R Wyatt, Witzard Seide, Emily Scarlett, Rachel Chamberlin, Jessica Bunin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tasha R WyattDepartment of Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0071-5298
Witzard SeideIndependent Scholar, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7801-6833
Emily ScarlettSchool of Nursing, University of Texas, San Antonio, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3610-2554
Rachel ChamberlinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Henry Jackson Foundation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0702-4992
Jessica BuninIndependent Scholar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5978-8152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Much of the current literature on remediation centers on procedural steps, due process, and the implementation of model programs. However, these studies frequently omit the critical perspective of the learners undergoing the process, which can reveal hidden forces that shape medical students' experiences. Methods: We conducted narrative interviews with 15 practicing physicians who remediated as medical students 5-15 years ago. Data were analyzed by examining plot, characters, and event sequences. Upon identifying a pattern of stages, we applied van Gennep's three-phase framework of rites of passage: Results: Remediation remained a vivid, salient experience for participants, characterized by disorientation. Separation was marked by strained community interactions and symbolic "parting." The liminal phase involved isolation and ambiguity while awaiting institutional decisions. Notably, aggregation, reintegration into the medical community, was achieved by few; more than half of the participants still feel excluded or marginalized years later. Discussion: Remediation is a harrowing process with long-lasting professional consequences. While all participants experienced separation and liminality, the failure to achieve aggregation highlights the "long shadow" remediation casts over a remediated physicians' career. We suggest that remediation committees consider providing a ritual specific to the reintegration phase to ensure learners feel successfully folded back into the professional community.

Indexed as

Military MedicinePhysiciansRemedial TeachingHumansInterviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID42730354
PMCPMC13565038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.