ArticlePerspectives on medical education2026
"Can You Hear Me? Can Anybody Pretty Please Validate [Me]?": The Long Shadow of Separation and Liminality in Military Physicians' Remediation.
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Much of the current literature on remediation centers on procedural steps, due process, and the implementation of model programs. However, these studies frequently omit the critical perspective of the learners undergoing the process, which can reveal hidden forces that shape medical students' experiences. Methods: We conducted narrative interviews with 15 practicing physicians who remediated as medical students 5-15 years ago. Data were analyzed by examining plot, characters, and event sequences. Upon identifying a pattern of stages, we applied van Gennep's three-phase framework of rites of passage: Results: Remediation remained a vivid, salient experience for participants, characterized by disorientation. Separation was marked by strained community interactions and symbolic "parting." The liminal phase involved isolation and ambiguity while awaiting institutional decisions. Notably, aggregation, reintegration into the medical community, was achieved by few; more than half of the participants still feel excluded or marginalized years later. Discussion: Remediation is a harrowing process with long-lasting professional consequences. While all participants experienced separation and liminality, the failure to achieve aggregation highlights the "long shadow" remediation casts over a remediated physicians' career. We suggest that remediation committees consider providing a ritual specific to the reintegration phase to ensure learners feel successfully folded back into the professional community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.