ReviewCureus2026
Clinical Use of Valproate and Divalproex in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review is to appraise the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of valproate (VPA), including divalproex sodium (DVPX), in managing irritability, aggression, repetitive behaviors, and other associated symptoms, mostly in the pediatric population with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Major medical literature databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), open-label trials, and any other relevant studies or clinical trials reporting on patients with ASD (predominantly children and adolescents) treated with DVPX/VPA for any reason. A total of 654 abstracts were screened, and four clinical trials were selected for inclusion. Out of these four clinical trials, three were RCTs (n = 13, 27, and 30), and one was an open-label trial. Data were extracted using a standardized form focused on study design and validity domains. Two reviewers independently abstracted data, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Meta-analysis was not performed due to a lack of homogeneity among the three RCTs. Although most of the studies reported improved overall symptoms, they had different outcome measures. The quality of evidence available is low, and there is a need for higher-powered studies in the future. There is insufficient evidence to make conclusive recommendations on DVPX/VPA for improvement in core symptoms in the pediatric population. However, DVPX/VPA may represent a potential off-label option for selected patients with significant irritability, aggression, and repetitive behaviors associated with ASD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.