ArticlePeerJ2026
Spatial prediction and drivers of surface soil organic carbon density in subtropical montane forests.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soil organic carbon (SOC) represents the largest terrestrial carbon (C) pool, and even small changes in its stock can exert great influences on regional and global C cycles. Quantifying the spatial distribution of forest SOC and identifying its key drivers are therefore central to climate change science. In this study, we collected 150 topsoil samples (0-20 cm) across six vegetation types spanning an elevation gradient of 500-1,900 m in Baishanzu National Park, Zhejiang Province. Soil organic carbon density (SOCD) was determined alongside litter stock, and the activities of three cellulolytic hydrolases-α-glucosidase (AG), β-glucosidase (BG), and cellobiohydrolase (CBH). Ten environmental covariates derived from remote sensing, climate, and topographic data were used to predict SOCD. Three machine learning models-random forest (RF), boosted regression trees (BRT), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-were evaluated using repeated nested five-fold cross-validation and nested nearest neighbor distance matching cross-validation (NNDM-CV), with hyperparameter tuning restricted to the corresponding outer-training partitions. The three algorithms showed broadly comparable predictive performance across the two validation schemes. Based on the XGBoost model, the predicted mean surface SOCD across the park was 108.6 t C hm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.