ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026
Over 3 in 4 adults potentially subject to Medicaid work requirements may already have a route to exclusion or compliance.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Starting in 2027, 18.5 million Medicaid enrollees will likely be subject to new work requirements that could lead to significant coverage losses. Methods: Using American Community Survey data, we estimate the share of the population of interest that will have a route to exclusion from or compliance with the requirements. We also explore how rates of exclusion from or compliance with work requirements vary by state and demographic group. Results: We find that 46% of those in our proxy population will meet the criteria for at least one exclusion, 58% will meet the criteria for compliance, and 78% will have at least one route to exclusion or compliance. The "exclusion or compliance" share varies from 70% in New York to 94% in North Dakota. It also varies by demographic group, as women and younger adults are more likely than their counterparts to have a route to exclusion or compliance. Conclusion: The large "exclusion or compliance" share implies that an important driver of coverage loss will be states' capacity to verify exclusions or compliance, as <1 in 4 enrollees are estimated to not have a route to exclusion or compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.