SynthesisPeerJ2026
Association between youth athletes' sports specialization and injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the specialization-injury relationship, and explore whether the specialization-injury relationship is moderated by study design, sport type, age, sex, and injury measurement type, injury mechanism, and anatomical location. Methods: We searched eight databases by related keywords and assessed the quality of the included studies using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) statistical software 3.7 examined heterogeneity, sensitivity, publication bias, overall effect size of specialization-injury relationship, and moderation effects. This review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251233318). Searches were conducted in eight electronic databases from inception to March, 2026. Results: The 15 included studies showed moderate heterogeneity, stable sensitivity analyses, and no publication bias. The overall odds ratio of the sports specialization-injury relationship was 2.00 (95% confidence interval [1.58-2.55], Conclusions: The findings indicate a positive association between sport specialization and injury risk among youth athletes, with variation across sport participation contexts. Specifically, athletes in both contact and non-contact sports demonstrated higher pooled odds of injury than those involved in multiple sports. Although the evidence is heterogeneous and should be interpreted with caution, these findings highlight the potential role of diversified sport participation in relation to injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.