Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730287›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Outcomes of 72-Hour Hospital Treatment Responsibility Post Discharge to Municipal Nursing Care.

Elise Harder, Ann-Sofie Kofoed Berthelsen, Julie Christina Grew, Sidsel Maria Jørgensen, Fiona Haustedt Mossman, Michaela Louise Schiøtz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elise HarderCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9210-6704
Ann-Sofie Kofoed BerthelsenCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5276-0310
Julie Christina GrewCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5770-9174
Sidsel Maria JørgensenCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9320-2009
Fiona Haustedt MossmanDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8482-7674
Michaela Louise SchiøtzCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2575-6686

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The increasing prevalence of individuals living with chronic conditions and multi-morbidity presents challenges to healthcare systems and coordination of coherent patient pathways. In Denmark, transitions between healthcare sectors are susceptible to disruption due to inadequate cross-sectoral collaboration. To improve continuity of care and cross-sectoral collaboration, an agreement of 72-hour hospital treatment responsibility post-discharge was implemented. Methods: We used data from a questionnaire survey for healthcare professionals, data from electronic patient records, and data from cross-sectoral medical record audits to evaluate outcomes of the implementation of the agreement. Results: Survey data suggested that the agreement may enhance cross-sectoral collaboration by improving communication and understanding of other sectors, with municipal healthcare professionals perceiving these benefits more strongly. Data from electronic patient records indicated increased attention to discharge documentation. Medical record audits suggest that the agreement may be supportive where medication-related uncertainties necessitated clarification. Conclusion: The evaluation shows that the agreement can facilitate cross-sectoral communication, in some cases may improve treatment quality and safety and may support safer transitions from hospital to municipal care. The agreement does not reduce readmissions among the target group in general; however, it might facilitate avoidance of unnecessary readmissions in cases where cross-sectoral dialogue is sufficient.

Indexed as

cross-sectoral collaborationcross-sector transitionintegrated carepatient pathwaystreatment quality

Identifiers

PMID42730287
PMCPMC13564373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.